C2I2.org
 Index to all volumes
  2008
  2007
  2006
  2005
  2004
  2003
 Useful web site addresses
 Contacting C2I2

Search for:
Type a word or a phrase. All forms of the word are searchable.

Click here to register to get free access to the newest editions on-line

Supported by


Marc Girard’s initial training led to an MSc in mathematics. He then became an MD in parallel with his research on mathematical modelling. He works on drugs mainly as a consultant for pharmaceutical firms and also practises as a psychotherapist in the Freudian discipline. Besides a number of scientific papers, he has published literary criticism particularly on Flaubert, Balzac and Zola as well as on the Grimm Brothers’ fairy tales. As a medical expert witness, he has been commissioned by French judges to comment on litigation involving drugs or chemicals (growth hormone, diethylstilbestrol, hepatitis B vaccines, cerivastatin, Gulf War syndrome, glycol ethers, mercury).
Principles of pharmacovigilance

Marc Girard
Independent pharmaceutical consultant

Address for correspondence:
Dr Marc Girard, MSc, MD
76 route de Paris
78760 Jouars-Pontchartain
France
Tel: +33-(0)1-3489-4229 Fax: +33-(0)1-3489-7608
Email: agosgirard@free.fr

Abstract
After a short historical survey of adverse drug reactions, this paper summarises the current organisation of pharmacovigilance in Europe, with its principles of reporting, assessing, understanding and preventing the adverse effects of medications. Issues related to contrast media are included to exemplify the principles. Respective responsibilities of the various stakeholders are described: the European Agency, EEC member states, manufacturers and, last but not least, health professionals.

The paper then focuses more specifically on spontaneous reporting, with the limits and biases that result from inevitable under-reporting. In the event of a new disease likely to be ascribed to a drug or a class of drugs, a conceptual framework for investigation is proposed, articulated on the criteria of:

• credibility
• causation
• re-assessment of benefit:risk ratio
• course of action.

In spite of its awkward methodological limitations, the author concludes that the principle of spontaneous reporting may be appropriate for investigating a new pathological entity such as nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).