Metallurgical principles of Nitinol and its use in interventional devices
Sylvie Lombardi1
and Philippe Poncet2
1Angiomed, subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc, Karlsruhe, Germany; 2Memry Corporation, Bethel, Connecticut, USA
Address for correspondence:
Sylvie Lombardi
Angiomed GmbH & Co.
Medizintechnik KG,Wachhaustrasse 6
D-76227 Karlsruhe
Germany
Tel: +49 721 9445 258 Fax: +49 721 9445 215
Email: sylvie.lombardi@crbard.com
Abstract
Nickel-titanium shape-memory alloys, commonly known as Nitinol, are used increasingly in a variety
of medical devices for minimally invasive and
interventional procedures. The success of Nitinol is attributable to two unique properties - shape-memory effect and superelasticity - based on the ability of Nitinol to exist in two reversible phases. Thermal
shape-memory enables Nitinol implants to be
compressed for insertion into delivery systems and deployment, but then restored to their original shape following release. Superelasticity is highly
advantageous in applications where crush and kink resistance, flexibility, constancy of applied stress and large expansion or deformation ratios are a necessity. Nitinol is stable, biocompatible, MRI compatible and
has good corrosion resistance. The unique combination of properties of Nitinol offers exciting possibilities for the design of new devices and instrumentation.
Introduction
Since the late 1980s, the nickel-titanium shapememory
alloys, commonly known as Nitinol, have been
increasingly utilised in a variety of medical devices used
in minimally invasive and interventional procedures.
Nitinol derives its name from Nickel Titanium Naval
Ordnance Laboratory. In the early 1960s, Buehler and
his associates from the US Naval Ordnance Laboratory
discovered the shape-memory property of Nitinol [1].
Nitinol exhibits two unique properties:
Nitinol is able to overcome a wide range of design challenges related to the miniaturisation of medical devices for less invasive procedures. The aim of this article is to briefly describe the metallurgical principles behind the unique properties of Nitinol, as well as comment upon some of the applications in today’s interventional devices.
Structure of Nitinol
The main properties of Nitinol are based on its ability to exist in two reversible crystalline phases. Phase transitions between liquid and solid states are commonly known phenomena, such as water freezing to ice. However, what makes Nitinol unique is its ability to exist in two distinct reversible crystal phases - in its solid state - known as martensite and austenite. The solid phase change in Nitinol, known as the reversible martensitic transformation, can be induced by two parameters: temperature and mechanical stress.
Shape-memory effect and applications
![]() |
| Figure 1. An atomic model depicting the shape-memory mechanism. (Diagram courtesy of Memry Corporation) |
Today, most self-expanding implants such as stents and filters use the thermal shape-memory of Nitinol to enable deployment into the body [2].
![]() |
| Figure 2. Thermal deployment of Bard® Luminexx™ stent. (a) Stent compression at low temperature; (b) Stent loading into delivery system; (c) and (d) Stent deployment at body temperature. |
Superelasticity and applications
The superelasticity phenomenon is caused by a stress-induced transformation. By deforming the austenite, stress-induced martensite is formed. The martensite reverts to austenite once the stress is removed (see Figure 3).
Superelastic Nitinol can be strained 20 times more than stainless steel without being plastically deformed, and has tremendous advantages in applications requiring:
Therefore, most Nitinol stents are:
![]() |
| Figure 3. An atomic model depicting the mechanism of superelasticity. (Diagram courtesy of Memry Corporation) |
To date, the most successful medical applications of Nitinol using the superelasticity property are:
- radiofrequency ablation - brachytherapy
- atherectomy - thrombectomy
- laser therapy
Biocompatibility and corrosion resistance
Experimental and clinical data strongly support Nitinol as a safe biomaterial: [1,3]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) compatibility
Nitinol is non-ferromagnetic with a lower magnetic susceptibility than stainless steel. Nitinol implants and devices are less likely to produce artefacts in MRI as compared to stainless steel, and are usually considered to be MRI safe [7].
Conclusion
Nitinol provides a unique combination of properties not found in other conventional metals traditionally used in medical devices. It offers unique possibilities for designing implantable devices and instrumentation for minimally invasive and interventional procedures.
- Nitinol can exist in two reversible crystalline solid phases (martensite and austenite). A phase change can be induced by temperature or mechanical stress
- Due to this feature, Nitinol has two unique properties - shape-memory effect and superelasticity - that can be utilised in medical devices
- The thermal shape-memory of Nitinol enables implants such as stents to be compressed for delivery into the body, and then restored to original shape following release and warming to body temperature
- The superelasticity of Nitinol provides flexibility, kink resistance, constancy of applied stress and recovery of original shape after crushing, leading to extensive use in medical applications
- Nitinol is a safe biomaterial, offering biocompatibility, corrosion resistance and MRI compatibility
References
- Ryhaenen J. Biocompatibility evaluation of Nickel-Titanium shape memory alloy. Academic dissertation, Oulun Yliopisto, Oulu, 1999.
- Stoeckel D. Nitinol medical devices and implants. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2000;9:81-8.
- Shabalovskaya SA. Surface, corrosion and biocompatibility aspects of Nitinol as an implant material. Biomed Mater Eng 2002;12:69-109.
- Thierry B, Merhi Y, Trepanier C, et al. Blood compatibility of Nitinol compared to stainless steel. In: Russell SM, Pelton AR, eds. Proceeding of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, (Eds) 2000;285-90.
- Venugopalan R, Trepanier C. Assessing the corrosion behavior of Nitinol for minimally invasive device design. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2000;9:67-74.
- Duerig TW, Tolomeo DE, Wholey M. An overview of superelastic stent design. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 2002;9:235-46.
- Shellock FG. Biomedical Implants and devices: Assessment of magnetic field interaction with a 3.0 Tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:721-32.
September 2004, 1098/OS

.jpg)



Management of left main coronary artery disease: CABG is still the best therapy
Left main stem stenting
New stent technologies: coated, covered and bifurcated stents
